Skip to main content
Security

Block Confirmations and Transaction Security

Why confirmations matter on proof-of-work chains, how many are needed for different transaction sizes, and the economics of chain reorganizations.

ETC Community
Ethereum Classic Community
4 min read

On proof-of-work blockchains like Ethereum Classic, transaction security is measured in block confirmations. Each confirmation makes it exponentially more expensive to reverse a transaction.

What Is a Confirmation?

When your transaction is included in block N, it has one confirmation. When block N+1 is mined on top of block N, your transaction has two confirmations. Each new block adds another confirmation.

Why Confirmations Matter

In PoW, miners compete to extend the longest chain. Occasionally, two miners find valid blocks at nearly the same time, creating a temporary fork. The network resolves this by following the chain with more cumulative work — the "heaviest chain."

Transactions in the shorter fork are returned to the mempool and may be re-included in a future block. This is a chain reorganization (reorg).

Confirmation Guidelines

The appropriate number of confirmations depends on the value at stake:

Transaction ValueRecommended ConfirmationsWait Time (~13s/block)
Small (< 100 ETC)6~78 seconds
Medium (100–10K ETC)20~4.3 minutes
Large (> 10K ETC)40~8.7 minutes
Exchange deposits40–1008.7–21.7 minutes

The Economics of Reorgs

To reverse a transaction with N confirmations, an attacker must:

  1. Mine an alternative chain starting from the block before the transaction
  2. This chain must be longer than the current chain (requiring > 50% of network hashrate sustained for N blocks)
  3. The cost scales linearly with N: more confirmations = more mining power × more time needed

After Ethereum's Merge, ETC's hashrate increased dramatically, making 51% attacks substantially more expensive than pre-Merge levels.

MESS and Additional Protections

In 2020, following 51% attacks, ETC implemented MESS (Modified Exponential Subjective Scoring, ECBP-1100) to penalize deep reorganizations. MESS was later deprecated after the post-Merge hashrate increase made attacks economically infeasible.

Compared to PoS Finality

Proof-of-stake chains like Ethereum offer deterministic finality — after a certain point, transactions cannot be reversed at all. PoW chains offer probabilistic finality — transactions become increasingly secure but are never mathematically irreversible. The tradeoff is that PoW finality requires no trusted validator set.

Share This Article

Help spread the word about Ethereum Classic and support the ecosystem